« Discussion:Odonates du Monde » : différence entre les versions

De Histoires Naturelles
Page créée avec « == 2025 (19 février) == * The placement of ''Enallagma maldivense'' in the genus ''Aciagrion'' removes the species ''Enallagma maldivense'' Laidlaw, 1902 from the list (duplicate !). * ''Protosticta sexcolorata'' Chandran, Muneer, Madhavan & Jose, 2023 {{FL}} correct date : ''Protosticta sexcolorata'' Chandran, Muneer, Madhavan & Jose, 2024. Note that ''Protosticta sexcoloratus'' (Chandran & al. 2023) is a preprint : ''nom. illeg.''. * As synonym... »
 
mAucun résumé des modifications
Ligne 1 : Ligne 1 :
== 2025 (19 février) ==
[[Fichier:Sjostedt1899.jpg|right|180px]]
* The placement of ''[[Enallagma maldivense]]'' in the genus ''[[Aciagrion]]'' removes the species ''[[Enallagma maldivense]]'' Laidlaw, 1902 from the list (duplicate !).
I noticed in the WOL what I assumed to be a date inconsistency, since the taxa attributed to Sjöstedt have two close dates: 1899 and 1900. However, the corresponding article can be found in a journal dated March 6, 1899, which is the correct date for the taxa concerned (Cover of the Monographie on the Odonates du Cameroun of March 8, 1899 : against).
* ''Protosticta sexcolorata'' Chandran, Muneer, Madhavan & Jose, 2023 {{FL}} correct date : ''[[Protosticta sexcolorata]]'' Chandran, Muneer, Madhavan & Jose, 2024. Note that ''Protosticta sexcoloratus'' (Chandran & al. 2023) is a preprint : ''nom. illeg.''.
* As synonym of ''[[Aciagrion occidentale]]'', you must complete the date for ''Enallagma insula'' Fraser, <u>1920</u>


<u>Small things</u>
[[Fichier:Sjostedtliste1899.jpg|center|400px]]
* In the synonymie of ''[[Calopteryx splendens]]'' the alphabetical order suggests : Syn ''Calopteryx amasina'' before Syn ''Calopteryx intermedia cecilia''.
{{C}} Sjöstedt (1899 : bottom of the page 6){{Cend}}
 
<u>Typographics errors on the WOL (Puget Sound)</u>
* ''Nesobasis badamuensium'' Marinov & Rashni, 2023 {{FL}} ''[[Nesobasis baidamuensium|Nesobasis <u>baidamuensium</u>]]'' Marinov & Rashni, 2023
* ''Pseudagrion acutidens'' Seehausen, Kalkman & Bedjanic, 2025 {{FL}} ''[[Pseudagrion acutidens]]'' Seehausen, Kalkman & <u>Bedjanič</u>, 2025
* ''Pseudagrion halmaherae'' Seehausen, Kalkman & Bedjanic, 2025 {{FL}} ''[[Pseudagrion halmaherae]]'' Seehausen, Kalkman & <u>Bedjanič</u>, 2025
* ''Pseudagrion igneum'' Seehausen, Kalkman & Bedjanic, 2025 {{FL}} ''[[Pseudagrion igneum]]'' Seehausen, Kalkman & <u>Bedjanič</u>, 2025
* ''Pseudagrion nigrihumerale'' Seehausen, Kalkman & Bedjanic, 2025 {{FL}} ''[[Pseudagrion nigrihumerale]]'' Seehausen, Kalkman & <u>Bedjanič</u>, 2025
 
<u>Management of lists with more than three authors : with mentions ''et al.''</u><br>
{{V}}Suggested rules{{eV}} - First rule (not in use on the WOL) : replace more than three authors with & al. : First-descriptor & al., date. But I understand that this is technically difficult for the ''Odonata Central'' version. This INCZ-accepted option is not applied to either version of the WOL. Second rule : if at least one of the descriptors is in the list of authors of the bibliographic reference, the entry Descriptor(s) ''in'' Author(s), date is simplified to Descriptor(s), date. There are numerous cases, the first of which date back to the mid-19<sup>th</sup> century. I propose the choice in the next exemples.
* ''Drepanosticta batanta'' Kovács & Theischinger in Kovács et al., 2015 {{FL}} ''[[Drepanosticta batanta]]'' Kovács & Theischinger, 2015 : descripteurs dans la liste des auteurs ! Full version : ''Drepanosticta batanta'' Kovács & Theischinger ''in'' Kovács, Theischinger, Horváth & Juhász, 2015
* ''Protosticta francyi'' Sadasivan, Vibhu, Nair & Palot in Vibhu et al., 2022 {{FL}} ''[[Protosticta francyi]]'' Sadasivan, Vibhu, Nair & Palot, 2022 : descripteurs dans la liste des auteurs ! Full version : ''Protosticta francyi'' Sadasivan, Vibhu, Nair & Palot ''in'' Vijayakumaran, Nair, Palot & Sadasivan, 2022
* ''Nososticta stueberi'' Theschinger et al., 2023 {{FL}} ''[[Nososticta stueberi]]'' Theischinger, Mitchell, Richards & Polhemus, 2023
* ''Nososticta tagula'' Theischinger et al., 2023 {{FL}} ''[[Nososticta tagula]]'' Theischinger, Mitchell, Richards & Polhemus, 2023
 
<u>Discarded taxa : orphaned taxa</u>
* ''[[Alloneura lansbergei]]'' de Selys Longchamps, 1886 ({{ad}} ''[[Prodasineura lansbergei]]'')
* ''[[Hetaerina bogotensis]]'' Förster, 1914
We need to work again on these.


* ''Coenagrion glaucum'' Sjöstedt, 1900 : ''Pseudagrion glaucum'' (Sjöstedt, 1900) {{FL}} correct date : ''Coenagrion glaucum'' Sjöstedt, 1899 : ''[[Pseudagrion glaucum]]'' (Sjöstedt, 1899)
* ''[[Hylaeschna]]'' Sjöstedt, 1899 [correct date here] [obsolete genus] – Note : the date of ''[[Hylaeschna paludis]]'' Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of ''[[Phyllomacromia paula]]''] is correct on the WOL.
* ''Libellago cameruniensis'' Sjöstedt, 1899 {{FL}} correct name : ''[[Libellago camerunensis]]'' Sjöstedt, 1899, the date is correct on the WOL.
* ''Libellago glaucifrons'' Sjöstedt, 1900 {{FL}} correct date : ''Libellago glaucifrons'' Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of ''[[Chlorocypha cyanifrons]]'']
* ''Libellago grandis'' Sjöstedt, 1900 {{FL}} correct date : ''Libellago grandis'' Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of ''[[Stenocypha gracilis]]'' : anteriority to be studied]
* ''Libellago neptunus'' Sjöstedt, 1900 : ''Chlorocypha neptunus'' (Sjöstedt, 1900) {{FL}} correct date : ''Libellago neptunus'' Sjöstedt, 1899 : ''[[Chlorocypha neptunus]]'' (Sjöstedt, 1899)
* ''Phaon camerunensis'' Sjöstedt, 1900 {{FL}} correct date : ''[[Phaon camerunensis]]'' Sjöstedt, 1899
* ''Pseudagrion flavipes'' Sjöstedt, 1900 {{FL}} correct date : ''Pseudagrion flavipes'' Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of ''[[Pseudagrion hemicolon]]'' : anteriority to be studied]
* ''Tragogomphus'' Sjöstedt, 1900 {{FL}} correct date : ''[[Tragogomphus]]'' Sjöstedt, 1899
* ''Tragogomphus aurivillii'' Sjöstedt, 1900 {{FL}} correct date : ''[[Tragogomphus aurivillii]]'' Sjöstedt, 1899
* ''Trithemis violacea'' Sjöstedt, 1900 {{FL}} correct date : ''[[Trithemis violacea]]'' Sjöstedt, 1899
* ''Umma fuscomarginis'' Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of ''[[Umma mesostigma]]'']. This taxon is well dated to 1899 on the WOL.
{{ong}}
{{Deliry2024sjostedt}}
{{Sjostedt1899}}
{{off}}
----
Pidancet undertook a collection of dragonflies from the Besançon region of France, which has been deposited at the Musée de Poligny (Jura department, [[France]]) (David [2020]). Pidancet (1856) adds two taxonyms that seem to have escaped the authors. The photographs in the collection are in line with Pidancet’s (1856) description and account for the following “new” synonymies, for which I agree with Gwénaël David. As this collection is housed in a “rural” museum and contains two types that are new to science (''typus''), local naturalists are taking steps to safeguard it.
* ''Aeschna justi'' Pidancet, 1856 is a synonym of ''[[Aeshna juncea]]''.
* ''Libellula bruandi'' Pidancet, 1856 is a synonym of ''[[Orthetrum brunneum]]''.
Further research shows that Barbiche (1887) agrees with the second synonym. For the first one he wondered as Dommanget (1998) do too, but Martin (1888) with this synonymie, as ourself (G.David et C.Deliry, ''com.'').<br>
<u>Notes</u> : This little-known synonymy was proposed here on the basis of photo examination of the holotype (David [2020], C.Deliry, ''com.'' confirmed with G.David, ''in litt.'', September 2020). ''Aeschna justi'' presented by Pidancet (1856) proves to correspond in my opinion (''com.,'' 2020), shared by that of Gwénaël David (''in litt.'') to ''[[Aeshna juncea]]''. The type is in a Franche-Comté collection at Poligny and I plan to work on it. Dommanget (1998) had already spotted this synonymy, but did not give it as certain. In addition, Boudot & al. (1998) quote Barbiche (1887), who thinks it could be correct, and Martin (1888), who considers the association to be correct. Barbiche (1887) points out that the ''justi'' is dedicated by Pidancet (1856) to his brother. The main authors of Catalogues sur les Odonates have not dealt with this taxonym. Dommanget (1998) says that the description of ''Aeshna justi'' resembles that of ''[[Aeshna juncea]]'' quite well, while pointing out that it is curious that Pidancet did not use this name, which was well known at the time (Note, however, that at the time the definition of ''[[Aeshna juncea]]'' was in fact not all that clear (''com.,'' February 18, 2025)). Dommanget (''op. cit.'') has not found an equivalent in catalogs, particularly Bridges' (1994). He proposes synonymy with [?]. This author does not know how best to associate ''Libellula bruandi'' with anything other than an ''[[Orthetrum]]'', a correspondence not made by authors until now. Boudot & al. (1998) refine Dommanget's (1998) thinking by adding that Barbiche (1887) thinks that the description seems to come very close to ''[[Aeshna juncea]]'' and Martin (1888) says that it is a species “which can only be the ''juncea''”. As for ''Libellula bruandi'', Barbiche (1887 ''in'' Boudot & al. 1998) says it is ''[[Orthetrum brunneum]]''. These conclusions are identical to ours, but have escaped the authors.
{{ong}}
{{ong}}
{{ChandranAl2023protosticta}}
{{Barbiche1887}}
{{ChandranAl2024prosex}}
{{BoudotAl1998}}
{{MarinovRashni2023}}
{{Bridges1994}}
{{SeehausenAl2025}}
{{David2020}}
{{Dommanget1998}}
{{Martin1888}}
{{Pidancet1856}}
{{off}}
{{off}}
----
<u>Typographics errors on the WOL (Puget Sound)</u><br>
* ''Metagrion annehueberae'' Kalkman &Richards, 2023 {{FL}} ''[[Metagrion annehueberae]]'' Kalkman <u>& R</u>ichards, 2023
* ''Calopteryx splendens tschaldririca'' Bartenev, 1909 {{FL}} ''Calopteryx splendens <u>tschaldirica</u>'' Bartenev, 1909 [synonym of ''[[Calopteryx splendens]]'']
* ''Prodasieura huai'' Zhou & Zhou, 2007 {{FL}} ''<u>Prodasineura</u> huai'' Zhou & Zhou, 2007  [synonym of ''[[Prodasineura fujianensis]]'']
* ''Epopththalmia kuani'' Jiang, 1998 {{FL}} ''<u>Epophthalmia</u> kuani'' Jiang, 1998 [synonym of ''[[Epophthalmia elegans]]'']
* ''Epopththalmia frontalis malabarensis'' Fraser, 1935 {{FL}} ''<u>Epophthalmia</u> frontalis malabarensis'' Fraser, 1935 [synonym of ''[[Epophthalmia frontalis]]'']

Version du 21 avril 2025 à 09:46

I noticed in the WOL what I assumed to be a date inconsistency, since the taxa attributed to Sjöstedt have two close dates: 1899 and 1900. However, the corresponding article can be found in a journal dated March 6, 1899, which is the correct date for the taxa concerned (Cover of the Monographie on the Odonates du Cameroun of March 8, 1899 : against).

Sjöstedt (1899 : bottom of the page 6)

  • Coenagrion glaucum Sjöstedt, 1900 : Pseudagrion glaucum (Sjöstedt, 1900) → correct date : Coenagrion glaucum Sjöstedt, 1899 : Pseudagrion glaucum (Sjöstedt, 1899)
  • Hylaeschna Sjöstedt, 1899 [correct date here] [obsolete genus] – Note : the date of Hylaeschna paludis Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of Phyllomacromia paula] is correct on the WOL.
  • Libellago cameruniensis Sjöstedt, 1899 → correct name : Libellago camerunensis Sjöstedt, 1899, the date is correct on the WOL.
  • Libellago glaucifrons Sjöstedt, 1900 → correct date : Libellago glaucifrons Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of Chlorocypha cyanifrons]
  • Libellago grandis Sjöstedt, 1900 → correct date : Libellago grandis Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of Stenocypha gracilis : anteriority to be studied]
  • Libellago neptunus Sjöstedt, 1900 : Chlorocypha neptunus (Sjöstedt, 1900) → correct date : Libellago neptunus Sjöstedt, 1899 : Chlorocypha neptunus (Sjöstedt, 1899)
  • Phaon camerunensis Sjöstedt, 1900 → correct date : Phaon camerunensis Sjöstedt, 1899
  • Pseudagrion flavipes Sjöstedt, 1900 → correct date : Pseudagrion flavipes Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of Pseudagrion hemicolon : anteriority to be studied]
  • Tragogomphus Sjöstedt, 1900 → correct date : Tragogomphus Sjöstedt, 1899
  • Tragogomphus aurivillii Sjöstedt, 1900 → correct date : Tragogomphus aurivillii Sjöstedt, 1899
  • Trithemis violacea Sjöstedt, 1900 → correct date : Trithemis violacea Sjöstedt, 1899
  • Umma fuscomarginis Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of Umma mesostigma]. This taxon is well dated to 1899 on the WOL.

Modèle:Deliry2024sjostedt Modèle:Sjostedt1899


Pidancet undertook a collection of dragonflies from the Besançon region of France, which has been deposited at the Musée de Poligny (Jura department, France) (David [2020]). Pidancet (1856) adds two taxonyms that seem to have escaped the authors. The photographs in the collection are in line with Pidancet’s (1856) description and account for the following “new” synonymies, for which I agree with Gwénaël David. As this collection is housed in a “rural” museum and contains two types that are new to science (typus), local naturalists are taking steps to safeguard it.

Further research shows that Barbiche (1887) agrees with the second synonym. For the first one he wondered as Dommanget (1998) do too, but Martin (1888) with this synonymie, as ourself (G.David et C.Deliry, com.).
Notes : This little-known synonymy was proposed here on the basis of photo examination of the holotype (David [2020], C.Deliry, com. confirmed with G.David, in litt., September 2020). Aeschna justi presented by Pidancet (1856) proves to correspond in my opinion (com., 2020), shared by that of Gwénaël David (in litt.) to Aeshna juncea. The type is in a Franche-Comté collection at Poligny and I plan to work on it. Dommanget (1998) had already spotted this synonymy, but did not give it as certain. In addition, Boudot & al. (1998) quote Barbiche (1887), who thinks it could be correct, and Martin (1888), who considers the association to be correct. Barbiche (1887) points out that the justi is dedicated by Pidancet (1856) to his brother. The main authors of Catalogues sur les Odonates have not dealt with this taxonym. Dommanget (1998) says that the description of Aeshna justi resembles that of Aeshna juncea quite well, while pointing out that it is curious that Pidancet did not use this name, which was well known at the time (Note, however, that at the time the definition of Aeshna juncea was in fact not all that clear (com., February 18, 2025)). Dommanget (op. cit.) has not found an equivalent in catalogs, particularly Bridges' (1994). He proposes synonymy with [?]. This author does not know how best to associate Libellula bruandi with anything other than an Orthetrum, a correspondence not made by authors until now. Boudot & al. (1998) refine Dommanget's (1998) thinking by adding that Barbiche (1887) thinks that the description seems to come very close to Aeshna juncea and Martin (1888) says that it is a species “which can only be the juncea”. As for Libellula bruandi, Barbiche (1887 in Boudot & al. 1998) says it is Orthetrum brunneum. These conclusions are identical to ours, but have escaped the authors.

Barbiche (Abbé) 1887 - Faune synoptique des Odonates de la Lorraine. - Bulletin de la Soc. d'histoire naturelle de Metz, 17e cahier (2e série) : 85-163. - ONLINE
Boudot J.P., Prot J.M. & Dommanget J.L. 1998 - Rectifications à l’article intitulé : Analyse et commentaires relatifs au « Catalogue des Libellulidées des environs de Besançon » de M. Léandre Pidancet (1856) par J.L. Dommanget (Martinia, 14 (1) : 31-36). - Martinia, 14 (4) : 136. - ONLINE
Bridges C.A. 1994 - Catalogue of the family-group, genus-group and species-group names of the Odonata of the world. 3e éd. - Urbana, chez l'Auteur. - ONLINE
David G. (JNE) 2020 - Odonates du Musée de Poligny. CR de la visite du 30 janvier 2020. - Document numérique.
Dommanget J.L. 1998 - Analyse et commentaire relatifs au "Catalogue des libellulidées des environs de Besançon" de M. Léandre Pidancet (1856). - Martinia, 14 (1) : 31-36. - ONLINE
Martin 1888 - [À préciser !]
Pidancet L. 1856 - Catalogue des Libellulidées des environs de Besançon. - Mém. de la Soc. d'émulation du département du Doubs, Série 2, 7. - Modèle:BIB


Typographics errors on the WOL (Puget Sound)

  • Metagrion annehueberae Kalkman &Richards, 2023 → Metagrion annehueberae Kalkman & Richards, 2023
  • Calopteryx splendens tschaldririca Bartenev, 1909 → Calopteryx splendens tschaldirica Bartenev, 1909 [synonym of Calopteryx splendens]
  • Prodasieura huai Zhou & Zhou, 2007 → Prodasineura huai Zhou & Zhou, 2007 [synonym of Prodasineura fujianensis]
  • Epopththalmia kuani Jiang, 1998 → Epophthalmia kuani Jiang, 1998 [synonym of Epophthalmia elegans]
  • Epopththalmia frontalis malabarensis Fraser, 1935 → Epophthalmia frontalis malabarensis Fraser, 1935 [synonym of Epophthalmia frontalis]