|
|
| Ligne 1 : |
Ligne 1 : |
| [[Fichier:Sjostedt1899.jpg|right|180px]]
| | == 2024 (DP : 23 juillet {{FL}} 23 et 25 juillet) == |
| I noticed in the WOL what I assumed to be a date inconsistency, since the taxa attributed to Sjöstedt have two close dates: 1899 and 1900. However, the corresponding article can be found in a journal dated March 6, 1899, which is the correct date for the taxa concerned (Cover of the Monographie on the Odonates du Cameroun of March 8, 1899 : against).
| | Question de Dennis Paulson (DP) le {{Vc}}23 juillet 2024{{eV}} - I was asked about the author(s) of ''[[Uropetala carovei]]'', so I found your email (17 janvier 2020), where I had accepted your suggestion that the author was White ''in'' Dieffenbach, 1843. But in that paper, there was no holotype designated, so I presume this qualifies it as a ''nomen nudum'', as Bridges (1994) pointed out. So I think it would be good to change the author back to White, 1846, but looking in Bridges, it would seem to be White ''in'' Richardson, 1846. |
| | |
| [[Fichier:Sjostedtliste1899.jpg|center|400px]]
| |
| {{C}} Sjöstedt (1899 : bottom of the page 6){{Cend}} | |
| | |
| * ''Coenagrion glaucum'' Sjöstedt, 1900 : ''Pseudagrion glaucum'' (Sjöstedt, 1900) {{FL}} correct date : ''Coenagrion glaucum'' Sjöstedt, 1899 : ''[[Pseudagrion glaucum]]'' (Sjöstedt, 1899)
| |
| * ''[[Hylaeschna]]'' Sjöstedt, 1899 [correct date here] [obsolete genus] – Note : the date of ''[[Hylaeschna paludis]]'' Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of ''[[Phyllomacromia paula]]''] is correct on the WOL.
| |
| * ''Libellago cameruniensis'' Sjöstedt, 1899 {{FL}} correct name : ''[[Libellago camerunensis]]'' Sjöstedt, 1899, the date is correct on the WOL.
| |
| * ''Libellago glaucifrons'' Sjöstedt, 1900 {{FL}} correct date : ''Libellago glaucifrons'' Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of ''[[Chlorocypha cyanifrons]]'']
| |
| * ''Libellago grandis'' Sjöstedt, 1900 {{FL}} correct date : ''Libellago grandis'' Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of ''[[Stenocypha gracilis]]'' : anteriority to be studied]
| |
| * ''Libellago neptunus'' Sjöstedt, 1900 : ''Chlorocypha neptunus'' (Sjöstedt, 1900) {{FL}} correct date : ''Libellago neptunus'' Sjöstedt, 1899 : ''[[Chlorocypha neptunus]]'' (Sjöstedt, 1899)
| |
| * ''Phaon camerunensis'' Sjöstedt, 1900 {{FL}} correct date : ''[[Phaon camerunensis]]'' Sjöstedt, 1899
| |
| * ''Pseudagrion flavipes'' Sjöstedt, 1900 {{FL}} correct date : ''Pseudagrion flavipes'' Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of ''[[Pseudagrion hemicolon]]'' : anteriority to be studied]
| |
| * ''Tragogomphus'' Sjöstedt, 1900 {{FL}} correct date : ''[[Tragogomphus]]'' Sjöstedt, 1899
| |
| * ''Tragogomphus aurivillii'' Sjöstedt, 1900 {{FL}} correct date : ''[[Tragogomphus aurivillii]]'' Sjöstedt, 1899
| |
| * ''Trithemis violacea'' Sjöstedt, 1900 {{FL}} correct date : ''[[Trithemis violacea]]'' Sjöstedt, 1899
| |
| * ''Umma fuscomarginis'' Sjöstedt, 1899 [synonym of ''[[Umma mesostigma]]'']. This taxon is well dated to 1899 on the WOL.
| |
| {{ong}}
| |
| {{Deliry2024sjostedt}}
| |
| {{Sjostedt1899}}
| |
| {{off}}
| |
| ---- | | ---- |
| Pidancet undertook a collection of dragonflies from the Besançon region of France, which has been deposited at the Musée de Poligny (Jura department, [[France]]) (David [2020]). Pidancet (1856) adds two taxonyms that seem to have escaped the authors. The photographs in the collection are in line with Pidancet’s (1856) description and account for the following “new” synonymies, for which I agree with Gwénaël David. As this collection is housed in a “rural” museum and contains two types that are new to science (''typus''), local naturalists are taking steps to safeguard it.
| |
| * ''Aeschna justi'' Pidancet, 1856 is a synonym of ''[[Aeshna juncea]]''.
| |
| * ''Libellula bruandi'' Pidancet, 1856 is a synonym of ''[[Orthetrum brunneum]]''.
| |
| Further research shows that Barbiche (1887) agrees with the second synonym. For the first one he wondered as Dommanget (1998) do too, but Martin (1888) with this synonymie, as ourself (G.David et C.Deliry, ''com.'').<br>
| |
| <u>Notes</u> : This little-known synonymy was proposed here on the basis of photo examination of the holotype (David [2020], C.Deliry, ''com.'' confirmed with G.David, ''in litt.'', September 2020). ''Aeschna justi'' presented by Pidancet (1856) proves to correspond in my opinion (''com.,'' 2020), shared by that of Gwénaël David (''in litt.'') to ''[[Aeshna juncea]]''. The type is in a Franche-Comté collection at Poligny and I plan to work on it. Dommanget (1998) had already spotted this synonymy, but did not give it as certain. In addition, Boudot & al. (1998) quote Barbiche (1887), who thinks it could be correct, and Martin (1888), who considers the association to be correct. Barbiche (1887) points out that the ''justi'' is dedicated by Pidancet (1856) to his brother. The main authors of Catalogues sur les Odonates have not dealt with this taxonym. Dommanget (1998) says that the description of ''Aeshna justi'' resembles that of ''[[Aeshna juncea]]'' quite well, while pointing out that it is curious that Pidancet did not use this name, which was well known at the time (Note, however, that at the time the definition of ''[[Aeshna juncea]]'' was in fact not all that clear (''com.,'' February 18, 2025)). Dommanget (''op. cit.'') has not found an equivalent in catalogs, particularly Bridges' (1994). He proposes synonymy with [?]. This author does not know how best to associate ''Libellula bruandi'' with anything other than an ''[[Orthetrum]]'', a correspondence not made by authors until now. Boudot & al. (1998) refine Dommanget's (1998) thinking by adding that Barbiche (1887) thinks that the description seems to come very close to ''[[Aeshna juncea]]'' and Martin (1888) says that it is a species “which can only be the ''juncea''”. As for ''Libellula bruandi'', Barbiche (1887 ''in'' Boudot & al. 1998) says it is ''[[Orthetrum brunneum]]''. These conclusions are identical to ours, but have escaped the authors.
| |
| {{ong}}
| |
| {{Barbiche1887}}
| |
| {{BoudotAl1998}}
| |
| {{Bridges1994}} | | {{Bridges1994}} |
| {{David2020}}
| |
| {{Dommanget1998}}
| |
| {{Martin1888}}
| |
| {{Pidancet1856}}
| |
| {{off}}
| |
| ---- | | ---- |
| <u>Typographics errors on the WOL (Puget Sound)</u><br>
| | Ma réponse du {{Vc}}23 juillet 2024{{eV}} - But you can be sure that : ''[[Uropetala carovei]]'' (White ''in'' Dieffenbach, 1843) from ''[[Petalura carovei]]'' White ''in'' Dieffenbach, 1843 is the correct version ! It is not a NN as Bridges (1994) said : not a ''nomen nudum''. The « type » would be in British Museum !<br> |
| * ''Metagrion annehueberae'' Kalkman &Richards, 2023 {{FL}} ''[[Metagrion annehueberae]]'' Kalkman <u>& R</u>ichards, 2023
| | The source is : {{Dieffenbach1843}} |
| * ''Calopteryx splendens tschaldririca'' Bartenev, 1909 {{FL}} ''Calopteryx splendens <u>tschaldirica</u>'' Bartenev, 1909 [synonym of ''[[Calopteryx splendens]]'']
| | and you can consult online the fact that the book is from Dieffenbach, the date 1843, in a chapter written about White and Doubleday, but the species is joined only with the name of White > The White (''in'' White & Doubleday : not useful) ''in'' Dieffenbach (1843) !!!<br> |
| * ''Prodasieura huai'' Zhou & Zhou, 2007 {{FL}} ''<u>Prodasineura</u> huai'' Zhou & Zhou, 2007 [synonym of ''[[Prodasineura fujianensis]]'']
| | These informations are correct and verified. The only problem that could arise is that the edition is badly dated.<br> |
| * ''Epopththalmia kuani'' Jiang, 1998 {{FL}} ''<u>Epophthalmia</u> kuani'' Jiang, 1998 [synonym of ''[[Epophthalmia elegans]]'']
| | The « traditional » version with White (1846) is not the first description, White ''in'' Richardson (1846)… too ! I had find these paper(s), but they are not in my computer here, in holiday. If you need, I will can find them later.<br> |
| * ''Epopththalmia frontalis malabarensis'' Fraser, 1935 {{FL}} ''<u>Epophthalmia</u> frontalis malabarensis'' Fraser, 1935 [synonym of ''[[Epophthalmia frontalis]]'']
| | See all joined informations in "images".<br> |
| | {{GAL|Whitea.png||Whitec.png||Whiteb.png|}} |
| | ---- |
| | Transmission le {{Vc}}25 juillet 2024{{eV}} des extraits et de la planche de ''[[Petalura carovei]]'' disponible chez [[White A. & Gardiner Butler A. 1846|White & Gardiner Butler (1846)]] (cliquer) : {{W&GB1846}} |
2024 (DP : 23 juillet → 23 et 25 juillet)
Question de Dennis Paulson (DP) le 23 juillet 2024 - I was asked about the author(s) of Uropetala carovei, so I found your email (17 janvier 2020), where I had accepted your suggestion that the author was White in Dieffenbach, 1843. But in that paper, there was no holotype designated, so I presume this qualifies it as a nomen nudum, as Bridges (1994) pointed out. So I think it would be good to change the author back to White, 1846, but looking in Bridges, it would seem to be White in Richardson, 1846.
Bridges C.A. 1994 - Catalogue of the family-group, genus-group and species-group names of the Odonata of the world. 3e éd. - Urbana, chez l'Auteur. - ONLINE
Ma réponse du 23 juillet 2024 - But you can be sure that : Uropetala carovei (White in Dieffenbach, 1843) from Petalura carovei White in Dieffenbach, 1843 is the correct version ! It is not a NN as Bridges (1994) said : not a nomen nudum. The « type » would be in British Museum !
The source is : Dieffenbach E. 1843 - Travels in New Zealand, with contributions to the geography, geology, botany and natural history of the country. - Murray, London, vol. 2 : 281-282. - ONLINE
and you can consult online the fact that the book is from Dieffenbach, the date 1843, in a chapter written about White and Doubleday, but the species is joined only with the name of White > The White (in White & Doubleday : not useful) in Dieffenbach (1843) !!!
These informations are correct and verified. The only problem that could arise is that the edition is badly dated.
The « traditional » version with White (1846) is not the first description, White in Richardson (1846)… too ! I had find these paper(s), but they are not in my computer here, in holiday. If you need, I will can find them later.
See all joined informations in "images".
Transmission le 25 juillet 2024 des extraits et de la planche de Petalura carovei disponible chez White & Gardiner Butler (1846) (cliquer) : White A. & Gardiner Butler A. 1846 - Zoology of the voyage of the H.M.S. Erebus & Terror. Insects. - London. - ONLINE
